Electronic linking shifts the boundaries between one text and another as well as between the author and the reader and between and the teacher and the student. It also has radical effects upon our experience of author, text, and work, redefining each. Its effects are so basic, so radical, that it reveals that many of our most cherished, most commonplace, ideas and attitudes toward literature and literary production turn out to be the result of that particular form of information technology and technology of cultural memory that has provided the setting for them. This technology -- that of the printed book and its close relations, which include the typed or printed page -- engenders certain notions of authorial property, authorial uniqueness, and a physically isolated text that hypertext makes untenable. The evidence of hypertext, in other words, historicizes many of our most commonplace assumptions, thereby forcing them to descend from the ethereality of abstraction and appear as corollary to a particular technology rooted in specific times and places. ---George P. Landow,

The media that records text not only changes the way we think about documentation, but changes the very nature of thought itself. Culturally we store knowledge. It is not that we are so much more brilliant than our primal ancestors, but that we have a larger and more advanced collection of knowledge. A baby snatched from 2000 b.c. would do fine in school today. As our knowledge is being placed into hypertextual archives, our ways of accessing data and cultural memory is changing. Eventually this will have a profound effect on human perception.